Water Quality
 

July 12, 2002

The Honorable Christine Todd Whitman
Administrator, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Ariel Rios Federal Building
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20004

Re: Water Quality Trading Policy

Dear Secretary Whitman,

The Association of California Water Agencies (ACWA) is pleased to submit comments on the proposed Water Quality Trading Policy to maintain water quality in unimpaired waters, facilitate development of Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDL) and trading to meet TMDLs. ACWA represents 440 public water agency members collectively responsible for more than 90 percent of the water delivered in California for residential, agricultural and industrial use.

ACWA offers these comments with the intent of helping facilitate the development of the trading concept. In general, ACWA supports the concept of water quality trading programs that provide incentives to reduce pollutant loading. Water agencies support the formulation of the EPA's trading initiative as a welcome tool in assuring water quality in both impaired and unimpaired waters, and in the furtherance of helping local communities to meet their own TMDLs.

The trading proposal appears to strike a good balance between the needed flexibility for state and local innovation and the need for clear accountability in Clean Water Act compliance and water quality improvements. As specific programs are developed and administered by the states at a local level on a watershed basis, the following principles should be incorporated:

  • Any program ultimately adopted should be voluntary.

  • Precedent to the development of any trading scheme in any watershed, the stakeholders should be permitted to engage in a rigorous scientific review of the appropriateness and capacity of the reasonable designated beneficial uses so as to prevent unrealistic expectations for such trading.

  • The program should require an overall net reduction in pollutant discharges. Where load or waste load allocations are not fully utilized, the remainder should be used to create credits.

  • Trading should be limited to the same watershed to assure the program's integrity.

  • The program should provide sufficient economic incentives to encourage participation.

  • A clear and predictable accounting and reporting mechanism needs to be established and followed.

  • The program should provide for cross-pollutant trading.

  • The plan should provide for a credit program that allows flexibility for trading ancillary water quality benefits (such as wetlands restoration, etc.), but which is justified based on the best science currently available.

  • Trading programs should encourage reductions in "legacy" or other "orphan share" pollutant loading (e.g., abandoned mine waste) that is not associated with a responsible point, or nonpoint source.

Again, ACWA supports the proposed U.S. EPA proposal and believes it does a good job of identifying the framework for a successful program. EPA should consider developing an incentive program to encourage states to develop water quality trading programs in compliance with EPA guidelines.

Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the trading initiative. ACWA stands ready to provide any additional input in the furtherance of this worthwhile effort.

Sincerely,

STEPHEN K. HALL
Executive Director


cc. Jean-Marie Peltier, Counselor to the Administrator
The Honorable G. Tracy Mehan III, Assistant Administrator for Water
The Honorable Benjamin Grumbles, Deputy Assistant Administrator


©2007 Association of California Water Agencies. Site Developed by ComputerGrafix