Outreach
MTBE in Drinking Water
 
  • Background
  • Policy Principles:
    • ACWA will steadfastly oppose any efforts by Congress to protect MTBE manufacturers from liability for groundwater contamination. A growing body of court precedent shows that MTBE is a defective product whose harmfulness was known well before its use became widespread. Congress should remove the safe harbor language from the energy bill before it is put to a vote in 2004.
    • In the meantime, the federal government should grant California a waiver from the oxygenate mandate to allow refiners flexibility in using ethanol in California.
    • ACWA members oppose efforts in the pending national energy bill to provide a ‘safe harbor’ to fuels manufacturers involved in groundwater contamination .
    • Fuel companies were never required to use MTBE in law. Neither the Clean Air Act nor EPA regulations require the use of MTBE or any particular oxygenate. Congress has no obligation to shield the producers from liability.
    • The safe harbor provision in the energy bill would shift liability for clean-up away from the polluters responsible for the problem, onto the backs of water consumers.
    • Despite upgrades to underground storage tanks, MTBE continues to leak into soil and groundwater (a state of California study found that as many as two-thirds of the upgraded tanks leaked MTBE).
    • Courts have successfully held oil companies responsible for the environmental harm and loss of water supplies caused by MTBE.
    • ACWA supports increases to the Leaking Underground Storage Tank program through the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency budget (VA-HUD appropriations bill).
Top | Print | Email this Page | Privacy Statement | Refund Policy | Contact ACWA | Sponsors | Site Map
©2008 Association of California Water Agencies.
Site Developed by ComputerGrafix