SB 623: News and Opinion Round Up

  • by Emily Allshouse
  • Aug 31, 2017
  • Water News

ACWA has compiled the following clips covering SB 623 by Sen. Bill Monning (D-Carmel), a bill aimed at funding safe drinking water solutions for disadvantaged communities. The bill was amended in the final weeks of session to include language establishing the state’s first tax on drinking water.

Articles from Aug. 23- 31 include:

Viewpoint: New water tax wrong way to fund clean water for all

Desert Sun

Aug. 30, 2017

ACWA President Kathleen Tiegs and Vice President Brent Hastey provide the water community’s perspective on SB 623’s drinking water tax in this new Op-Ed from the Desert Sun. Key arguments against the tax include the fact that “imposing a regressive tax has a bigger impact on families just above low-income thresholds,” that the bill would “turn local water agencies into taxation entities that send money to Sacramento” and that the last-minute addition of the tax in the final weeks of the legislative session “prevented proper vetting before all applicable committees.”

Imposing a tax on water users not the solution: Letters

Daily Bulletin

Aug. 30, 2017

Cucamonga Valley Water District’s Board Vice President Luis Cetina answers the Daily Bulletin’s “Question of the Week, Aug. 21,” which asks “Is safe drinking water fee all wet?” In his response he says in part: “Safe and reliable drinking water is critical to human life and no one in a state as affluent as California should go without safe and clean drinking water. The manner in which to address the issue, however, is in question… This is a public health and safety issue that needs to be addressed, but the state needs to look at other resources that are available to them, such as the state’s general fund, federal safe drinking water funds, and general obligation bonds.”

Wash our hands of the statewide water tax

The Acorn

Aug. 30, 2017

This Op-Ed submitted to The Acorn by the Las Virgenes Municipal Water District’s Board of Directors outlines the district’s opposition to the water tax. Among some of the key points, the district points out that SB 623’s “tax on businesses and those with larger connections would be substantially higher, up to $10 per month” and that “… unelected state officials in Sacramento could increase the tax to generate two times the estimated funding needed… without approval by the legislature or voters.”

After drinking water, will California tax air?” 

NewsMax

Aug. 29, 2017

Syndicated columnist and author Michael Reagan calls SB 623 a “money-grab” in this NewsMax Op-Ed. After noting that California residents pay some of the highest income taxes (and sales taxes) in the country, he goes on to say “Yet with all that money sloshing around in the state’s general fund the politicians in California can’t guarantee residents baseline government services like clean, drinkable water.”

Gulp! State Senate may tax drinking water from tap

Idyllwild Town Crier

Aug. 29, 2017

This article from the Idyllwild Town Crier discusses SB 623’s tax on drinking water and notes that the Assembly Appropriations Committee analysis questions whether “adequate time for the public to review the provisions of the this bill” had been given, a key argument for those in opposition to the tax. The article also includes an interview with Idyllwild Water District Acting General Manager Jack Hoaglund who says SB 623 “will be a bureaucratic nightmare to administer and continue to track.”

Local water officials object to proposed state ‘water tax’

Rancho Santa Fe Review

Aug. 29, 2017

This article from the Rancho Santa Fe Review discussion opposition to SB 623 in the San Diego area, including by the San Diego County Water Authority and Santa Fe Irrigation District. Santa Fe Irrigation District’s Jessica Parks and San Diego County Water Authority’s Glenn Farrel are both quoted.

Creating new statewide tax on water is bad policy” 

East Bay Times

Aug. 28, 2017

In this East Bay Times Op-Ed, ACWA Past President John Coleman explains why SB 623’s proposed statewide tax on water is “bad policy.” He directly addresses the “problematic” process for establishing a drinking water tax through last-minute amendments in the final weeks of session. “Proponents have been planning to insert this tax for months, but kept all details under wraps until the last few weeks of session. Not only did this preclude the public and advocacy groups from examining the tax and weighing in, but it also prevented proper vetting before all applicable committees. This is a major change to taxation and water policy that warrants thorough policy committee debate and discussions,” Coleman says.

Proposed tax not the way to provide safe, reliable water” 

The Press Enterprise

Aug. 28, 2017

Eastern Municipal Water District Board President David J. Slawson and General Manager Paul D. Jones II discuss their district’s efforts to provide safe drinking water to rural, low-income communities in Riverside County and why SB 623’s drinking water tax is “not the way to provide safe, reliable water.” They discuss the need for “sensible funding solutions” and “a well-defined governance structure” that ensures public money is managed responsibly. “By enacting governance changes through consolidation, regional partnerships or reorganization, there will be an opportunity to better determine the needs for state supplemental funding and ensure local, public oversight into the resources invested in resolving these issues… If we do not fix the underlying governance problem, the current solution proposed by SB623 will simply ‘throw good money after bad,’” the Op-Ed reads.

Oppose new tax on water

Ventura County Star

Aug. 28, 2017

This Letter to the Editor by Las Virgenes Municipal Water District Board Members Glen Peterson and Charles Caspary highlights another important problem with SB 623’s proposed tax on drinking water. “As drafted, future increases in this tax would bypass constitutional safeguards, would not require legislative approval, and revised tax amounts would be set by unelected state employees,” the letter reads. “A better approach that Las Virgenes can support would be to use dollars from the state’s general fund, general obligation bond funds, and the proposed new assessment related to fertilizers, which can contaminate drinking water sources.”

 “Last-minute water tax can’t be justified however worthy the cause” 

The San Diego Tribune

Aug. 25, 2017

This editorial by The San Diego Tribune hits the nail on the head. SB623’s last-minute tax on drinking water “can’t be justified.” The editorial reads in part: “…to wait until the legislative session’s 11th hour and unveil a first-ever tax on tap water to address the problem is also absolutely unacceptable… Lawmakers passed a measure declaring that “every human being has the right to safe, clean, affordable, and accessible water… Now Californians are told lawmakers can’t commit themselves to devoting a tiny fraction of the state budget to honor the intent of the measure, so a new category of taxation must be created.”

 “Opinion: Taxing water wont make it more affordable” 

Times of San Diego

Aug. 24, 2017

San Diego County Water Authority Board Chair Mark Muir calls a tax on drinking water “counterproductive” to water affordability in this Times of San Diego Op-Ed.  He also discusses the trouble with forcing local water agencies to collect taxes for the state saying: “If past is precedent, state government won’t pay for this service, which will put more upward pressure on local agencies that already are stretched thin — and ultimately on water rates. In the end, ratepayers face the double-whammy of paying higher taxes and paying water agencies to collect and distribute those funds.”

First-ever water tax proposed to tackle unsafe drinking water in California” 

The Mercury News

Aug. 23, 2017

In this Mercury News article, ACWA Deputy Executive Director for Government Relations Cindy Tuck and Dublin San Ramon Services District Community Affairs Supervisor Sue Stephenson are interviewed on why public water agencies oppose a drinking water tax. Calling water “essential to life,” Tuck says drinking water shouldn’t be taxed, while Stephenson says that the state should use existing resources before creating a new tax. “The whole purpose of the general fund is to help take care of disadvantaged communities…There’s no reason that they could not also fund communities that need access to drinking water,” Stephenson says.

Learn More

For more information about ACWA’s SB 623 opposition efforts, please see ACWA’s No Water Tax webpage.

Suggested Resources

15 RESOURCES prev next
Water Professionals Appreciation Week Toolkit

Sorry, but only ACWA members have permission to view this content. Member login is required.

Coalition Comments on State Wetland Definition and Procedures for Discharges

Submitted to the State Water Resources Control Board on Sept. 18, 2017.

Ag Industry Comments on COMMENTS ON STATEWIDE PROCEDURES FOR DISCHARGES OF DREDGED OR FILL MATERIALS

Submitted to the State Water Resources Control Board on Sept. 18, 2017.

Member Comments on Statewide Procedures for Discharges of Dredged or Fill Materials

Submitted to the State Water Resources Control Board on Sept. 18, 2017.

Comments on Proposed Surface Water Augmentation Regulations

Submitted to the State Water Resources Control Board on Sept. 12, 2017.

Special Members-Only Webinar: ACWA’s Proposed Agriculture Committee

Sorry, but only ACWA members have permission to view this content. Member login is required.

High Priority Federal Legislation Chart

Sorry, but only ACWA members have permission to view this content. Member login is required.

Federal Legislative Matrix

Sorry, but only ACWA members have permission to view this content. Member login is required.

Federal Regulatory Chart

Sorry, but only ACWA members have permission to view this content. Member login is required.

Joint Comments on Preliminary Draft Regulations for Environmental Lab Accreditation

Submitted to the State Water Resources Control Board on Sept. 7, 2017.

Water Reliability: The Continued Value of Local Projects (Region 8)

Sorry, but only ACWA members have permission to view this content. Member login is required.

No Water Tax Toolkit

Sorry, but only ACWA members have permission to view this content. Member login is required.

Priority Issues Bulletin

Sorry, but only ACWA members have permission to view this content. Member login is required.

Joint Response to Comments Related to 1,2,3-TCP MCL

Submitted to the State Water Resources Control Board on July 14, 2017.

Comments on ALJ Ruling to Modify D-17-01-006

Submitted to California Public Utilities Commission on July 11, 2017.

Suggested News

15 Articles prev next
DWR to Host Online SGMA Grant Workshop Sept. 27

The California Department of Water Resources will hold an online workshop Sept. 27 to help groundwater managers complete grant applications […]

ACWA News: Sept. 22, 2017

Sorry, but only ACWA members have permission to view this content. Member login is required.

Faces of Water Q&A – September 2017

  Telling the stories of the people who work to deliver California’s water… 1.) Describe your job? I am responsible for […]

Moulton Niguel and OC Coastkeeper Bring Water Education to Schools

Orange County schoolkids will soon get their feet wet in water policy. In a first-of-its-kind partnership just in time to […]

California Establishes Annual Water Professionals Appreciation Week

California’s first-ever Water Professionals Appreciation Week will launch Oct. 7 as part of a new annual designation intended to highlight […]

ACWA Presents Findings of Water Storage Integration Study to California Water Commission

The California Water Commission on Wednesday heard from a panel of speakers on the benefits of integrated water operations and […]

PPIC Recommends Action to Protect Headwater Forests

A newly released report by the Water Policy Center of the Public Policy Institute of California urges new commitment and […]

Key Water-Related Bills Held at End of Legislative Session

The 2017-’18 Legislative Session has been challenging by all accounts. ACWA staff, working with members and other stakeholders, were a […]

Central Basin Awarded for Achieving Highest Standards in Financial Reporting

Commerce, CA – The Central Basin Municipal Water District has been awarded the Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial […]

TID Takes Visual Approach to its Annual Report

With a focus on infographics, numbers and visuals instead of the traditional narrative approach, Turlock Irrigation District published its 2016 […]

Critical Long-Term Conservation Bills Held in the Legislature

After months of intense advocacy by ACWA, its members, and other stakeholders, two key long-term conservation bills – AB 1668 […]

CALFED Grants Awarded to Santa Margarita and Semitropic

The Santa Margarita Water District and Semitropic Water Storage District have been awarded CALFED Water Use Efficiency Grants, the U.S. Bureau of […]

Water Plan Plenary to be held Sept. 27

The California Department of Water Resources will hold its second annual plenary for Update 2018 of the California Water Plan […]

Importance of Water Reliability Explored at ACWA Region 8 Event

More than 80 ACWA members gathered August 24th for the one-day Region 8 event, “Water Reliability: The Continued Value of […]

ACWA Members Tour Mount Tam Watershed

ACWA Region 1 and the Marin Municipal Water District hosted a tour of the Mount Tam watershed on August 4. […]