SGMA Feature – August 2017

  • by Pamela Martineau
  • Aug 18, 2017
  • Newsletters

Soquel Creek Water District

SGMA overview provided by: Melanie Mow Schumacher, PE, associate manager- special projects, Soquel Creek Water District

1.) What groundwater basin or basins is Soquel Creek involved with through a newly formed GSA?

Soquel Creek Water District is involved in the management of the Santa Cruz Mid-County Groundwater Basin (Basin Number 3-001) which was approved by DWR during the 2016 Basin Modification Process that consolidates portions of a number of Bulletin 118-recognized basins/sub-basins, including West Santa Cruz Terrace, Santa Cruz Purisima Formation, Pajaro Valley, and Soquel Valley.

2.) What other agencies are participating in the GSA?

The Santa Cruz Mid-County Groundwater Agency (MGA) is an 11-member board comprised of two elected officials from Central Water District, City of Santa Cruz, County of Santa Cruz, and Soquel Creek Water District, and three private well representatives.

The agency was formed by a Joint Powers Agreement and corresponding bylaws in Spring 2016 and is recognized by the state as the exclusive agency for management of the Santa Cruz Mid-County Groundwater Basin.

The agency’s regularly scheduled public board meetings are held every other month on the third Thursday of the month in the evenings, unless otherwise noted.

3.) What are some unique aspects or challenges of that basin (or basins)?

Seawater Intrusion/Contamination – The basin is identified as critically overdrafted due to the historical overpumping of the basin that has made water levels at the coast too low to protect against seawater intrusion. Contamination at the coastline has occurred at both ends of the groundwater basin and the challenge is to bring the basin back into sustainability so that the seawater intrusion doesn’t move farther inland.
Inland vs. Coastal Groundwater Pumping – What are the impacts and differences on the overdraft condition by inland and coastal pumping? Fees – How will fees be determined to implement the Groundwater Sustainability Plan components? Locally, our GSA has preliminarily been working toward a model where partner agencies would develop/fund water supply projects based on proportional use of the basin and general management activities would be cost-shared. Will this be the final model used in the GSP? We aren’t sure yet.

4.) What kind of outreach has your agency done in getting the word out on developing the GSPs?

The MGA recently has been holding informational meetings to get more interest and engagement with private well owners.

A Groundwater Sustainability Plan Advisory Committee is being formed to expand and include public engagement. The committee’s purpose is to make groundwater sustainability recommendations to the MGA board. Committee members will review technical information, give advice on basin sustainability goals, plan objectives, project funding, plan implementation, and other topics as identified by the committee and the board. The time commitment will vary and is expected to take 10 hours per month from September 2017 through July 2019.

The MGA board will be utilizing professional facilitation services to work with the GSP Advisory Committee.

6.) What has been the community reaction to the effort to implement SGMA?

Most of the community at this point is in a “watch and wait” position or SGMA isn’t even on their radar. I believe that once we begin to talk if fees will be required (and when) then more interest may be piqued. It will be really important for us to make sure that information is available to discuss and expand engagement.


Print PDF Version

Suggested Resources

15 RESOURCES prev next
Webinar: Communicating During a Crisis

Sorry, but only ACWA members have permission to view this content. Member login is required.

Coalition Letter: Coronavirus Response Act; Water Sector Sick Leave

To: Leader McConnell, Speaker Pelosi, Leader Schumer, and Leader McCarthy Subject: We, the nation’s public water sector, write to alert […]

Comment Letter: ACWA Comments on State Wetland Definition

Agency: State Water Resources Control Board Subject: Draft Guidance for the State Wetland Definition and Procedures for Discharges of Dredge […]

Webinar: Learn How to Apply for the $830M SGIP Funds

ACWA hosted a webinar on March 11 to discuss the Self-Generation Incentive Program (SGIP), which has $830 million in funding […]

Federal Regulatory Issues Chart

Sorry, but only ACWA members have permission to view this content. Member login is required.

Comment letter: ACWA Comments on De-Energization

Agency: California Public Utilities Commission Subject: Association of California Water Agencies Comments on Proposed Additional Modified De-Energization Guidelines and Files […]

Priority Issues Bulletin

Sorry, but only ACWA members have permission to view this content. Member login is required.

Recommendations for Resilient Headwaters

ACWA’s headwater documents showcase the importance of improved headwaters management. Benefits include increased water yield and quality, enhanced natural features […]

Improved Management of California’s Headwaters

  Improved Management of California’s Headwaters outlines ACWA’s updated Headwaters Policy Principles, which were adopted by the ACWA Board of […]

Comment letter: ACWA Comments on Draft Water Resilience Portfolio

To: Nancy Vogel, Director of the Governor’s Water Portfolio Program Subject: Association of California Water Agencies’ Comments regarding the Draft […]

Comment Letter: ACWA Joint Comments on Draft Policy for the Safe and Affordable Drinking Water Fund

Agency: State Water Resources Control Board Subject: Draft Policy for Developing the Fund Expenditure Plan for the Safe and Affordable Drinking Water […]

ACWA’s Five-Year Strategic Plan

ACWA’s five-year strategic plan will afford the association the benefit of a broader forecast of resources, as well as the […]

Comment Letter: ACWA Comments on Urban Water Conservation Reporting

Agency: State Water Resources Control Board Subject: Proposed Urban Water Conservation Reporting Regulations Description: ACWA provided public comment on the proposed urban […]

Federal Legislative Matrix

Sorry, but only ACWA members have permission to view this content. Member login is required.

Comment Letter: ACWA Comments on Public Health Goals for PFAS

Agency: Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment Subject: Public Health Goals for perfluorooctanoic acid and perfluorooctane sulfonate Description: ACWA provided public comment […]

Suggested News

15 Articles prev next
Western Municipal Water District declares local state of emergency

RIVERSIDE – The Western Municipal Water District (Western) Board of Directors on Wednesday, April 1, adopted Resolution 3112 declaring a […]

Don’t get fooled by water quality and customer information scams, Western warns

RIVERSIDE – Western Municipal Water District (Western) is urging customers to beware of calls, emails or visits from scammers claiming […]

TUD Continues Providing Essential Services During COVID-19

Tuolumne Utilities District (TUD or District) continues to respond 24/7 to emergencies and provide essential water and wastewater services to […]

Elk Grove Water District Water Quality and Supply Amid COVID -19

On March 16, 2020, the Elk Grove Water District (EGWD) announced that it will be implementing Risk Level 3, as […]

Elk Grove Water District Suspends Penalties Fees and Terminations

On March 19, 2020 the Sacramento County Health Officer issued a stay-at-home directive halting all business within the County except […]

Elk Grove Water District Offices Temporarily Closed to the Public

Effective March 17, 2020, the Elk Grove Water District (EGWD) will be temporarily the health and safety of its customers […]

State Issues Permit for Long-Term Operations of the State Water Project

SACRAMENTO – The California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) on Tuesday issued an Incidental Take Permit (ITP) to the Department […]

March Precipitation Not Enough to Offset Dry Winter

SACRAMENTO – The Department of Water Resources (DWR) today conducted the fourth manual snow survey of 2020 at Phillips Station. […]

COVID-19 Update: Drinking Water Is Safe

WALNUT – Walnut Valley Water District (WVWD) is taking all necessary measures to ensure the delivery of safe, clean, and […]

PG&E Sells Narrows Hydroelectric Facility to Yuba Water Agency

MARYSVILLE — Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E) has sold its Narrows Hydroelectric Project to Yuba Water Agency. Escrow closed […]

First ACWA COVID-19 Webinar Materials Available

Presentations and a recording of a March 30 webinar on crisis communications within the context of the COVID-19 situation are […]

Public Water System Reporting Deadline Extended

The State Water Resources Control Board’s Division of Drinking Water has extended the deadline for the submission of 2019 Electronic […]

$1,783,000 Available to Fund California Forests & Watersheds Resilience

The National Fish and Wildlife Foundation (NFWF) and the U.S. Forest Service have announced funding for the California Forests and […]

NID completes first phase of crucial canal replacement project

Keeping infrastructure intact and functioning is important to efficient water delivery. For nearly 100 years the Nevada Irrigation District (NID) has […]

CVWD to provide more drinking water to Oasis Mobile Home Park

Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) will be extending its temporary supplemental drinking water assistance to Oasis Mobile Home Park until […]