Necessity of Protecting Water Systems from CERCLA Liability for PFAS

  • Apr 28, 2022
  • Comment Letters

To: Dear Chairman Carper, Ranking Member Capito, Chairman DeFazio, Ranking Member Graves, Chairman Pallone, and Ranking Member McMorris Rodgers

Subject: Necessity of Protecting Water Systems from CERCLA Liability for PFAS

Letter excerpt:

On behalf of organizations representing the nation’s drinking water, wastewater, and water reuse utilities, we request that Congress provide an explicit exemption from liability under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) if PFAS chemicals are designated as hazardous substances. As organizations dedicated to the protection of public health and the environment, we call on Congress to maintain CERCLA’s bedrock principle of polluter pays, and to reject any policy that seeks to shift the burden for PFAS cleanups onto the public. Where appropriate, Congress has protected certain entities in the past from CERCLA liability, and we ask Congress to do the same for the nation’s water sector in the case of PFAS contamination.1 We further urge robust federal funding to advance understanding of PFAS risks, exposure pathways, and treatment and destruction technologies.

Download Comment Letter

Suggested Resources

3 RESOURCES
Comment Letter: U.S. EPA: National Primary Drinking Water Regulation for Perchlorate

To: Anne Lausier, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Ground Water and Drinking Water, Standards and Risk Management Division Subject: […]

Comment Letter: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: PFAS Data Reporting and Recordkeeping Under TSCA — Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OPPT-2020-0549

To: Megan Nelson, Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Subject: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: PFAS Data […]

Comment Letter: Comments on OEHHA’s First Public Review Draft Proposed Public Health Goal for 1,4-Dioxane in Drinking Water

Agency: Pesticide and Environmental Toxicology Branch, Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment, California Environmental Protection Agency Subject: Comments on OEHHA’s […]