ACWA Advocates for Balanced Alternative to Drinking Water Tax During Emotional Budget Subcommittee Hearings at the Capitol

  • by Emily Allshouse
  • Mar 16, 2018
  • Water News

This week during budget subcommittee hearings in the Assembly and Senate, ACWA and several member agencies testified in opposition to the drinking water tax proposed in the Brown Administration’s budget trailer bill related to safe drinking water, and instead strongly advocated for ACWA’s alternative funding proposal which would meet the goal of the proposed legislation without a tax on drinking water.

Wednesday’s budget hearing included lengthy and emotional public testimony in support of the tax by dozens of men, women and children from disadvantaged communities that lack safe drinking water. ACWA’s testimony at both hearings emphasized the water community’s dedication to advancing solutions to this real and serious problem, while standing firmly in opposition to an impractical and unnecessary tax on drinking water.

Assembly Hearing – Wednesday, March 14

Cautioning attendees that the day’s agenda was “packed,” Assembly Budget Subcommittee No. 3 on Resources and Transportation Chair Richard Bloom (D-Santa Monica) began Wednesday’s hearing with an initial announcement that he would limit public testimony to name, organization and position.

After working through 11 other issues on its agenda, the budget trailer bill proposal was taken up last by the committee. ACWA Director of State Legislative Relations Wendy Ridderbusch provided the lead opposition testimony during public comment.

“We support a credible and equitable funding mix – an alternative – that includes ongoing federal safe drinking water state revolving fund dollars, reliable general obligation water bond money, focused nitrate assessments and the state’s general fund to create a funding source, for instance a protected and secured endowment fund, to pay for operation and maintenance costs,” said Ridderbusch. “We feel that we need this balanced funding portfolio package to ensure that there is safe and affordable drinking water in the communities that don’t have access to it.”

“Why can’t we work together? Why can’t we try something different?” she added.

Representatives from ACWA member agencies and associates also testified in opposition to a drinking water tax and in support of ACWA’s alternative funding proposal during public comment. Those agencies included: California Municipal Utilities Association, Irvine Ranch Water District, South Tahoe Public Utility District, Carmichael Water District, Hidden Valley Lake Community Services District, City of Santa Rosa, City of Burbank, Camrosa Water District, Yuba County Water Agency, East Valley Water District, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Fresno, United Conservation Water District, Zone 7 Water, Westlands Water District, Mojave Water District, Western Municipal Water District, Alameda County Water District, Eastern Municipal Water District, Mesa Water District, Santa Margarita Water District, Helix Water District, San Diego County Water Authority, Regional Water Authority, Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District, Las Virgenes Municipal Water District, Municipal Water District of Orange County, Monterey Peninsula Water Management District, City of Watsonville, and Otay Water District.

Opposition to the drinking water tax was also expressed by the League of California Cities, California Special Districts Association, and Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association, among several others.

Those testifying in support of the proposed tax on drinking water included: Community Water Center, Western Growers, Environmental Defense Fund, Water Foundation and approximately 50 residents from disadvantaged communities that lack safe drinking water.

“Support this bill, or drink our water,” they implored the subcommittee.

After hearing all testimony, the subcommittee opted to hold the item open to allow further consideration of the issues involved before making a decision. Additionally, to inform the subcommittee’s deliberations, Bloom asked State Water Resources Control Board Chair Felicia Marcus to respond to opposition concerns that were raised during the hearing in a letter addressed to the subcommittee.

Senate Hearing – Thursday, March 15

Just as it had been the day before in the Assembly, the budget trailer bill was the last item on the agenda for the Senate Budget Subcommittee No. 2 on Resources, Environmental Protection, Energy and Transportation hearing. Interestingly, in discussing earlier agenda items, subcommittee members debated the merits of using the state’s general fund versus special funds for issues of statewide importance. During that debate subcommittee Chair Bob Wieckowski (D-Fremont) appeared to be supportive of some uses of the general fund under this heading.

Ed Manning, who represents Mojave Water District, Westlands Water District, and Western Municipal Water District, kicked off public comments with a reminder to the subcommittee that the drinking water tax proposal before them has not received any review by a legislative policy committee. He also expressed his concerns with using the budget trailer bill process to vet high-priority, substantive policy issues rather than a transparent legislative policy committee process.

Ridderbusch then testified on behalf of ACWA continuing to deliver key messages regarding opposition to a drinking water tax and specifically highlighting recent ACWA-sponsored polling that shows that 74% of Californians believe the state should using existing funds for safe drinking water. Additionally, the polling shows that Californians believe it is not appropriate to tax a resource that is essential to life. She also expressed concerns over the precedent of the tax.

“It’s not just going to be a dollar a month, like we’ve heard…” Ridderbusch said regarding the tax, noting that there are other parties vying for funds from a tax on water for many other purposes.

Following Ridderbusch’s testimony many of the same ACWA member agencies and associates testified in alignment with ACWA’s position. Orange County Water District, Rincon Del Diablo Municipal Water District, Olivenhain Municipal Water District, Padre Dam Municipal Water District, and Long Beach Water also weighed in to oppose a tax on drinking water.

Additionally, several other groups expressed opposition to the agricultural enforcement relief provisions included in the bill, citing inconsistency with the “polluter pays” principle, which was noted by the subcommittee.

Those testifying in support included many of the same organizations from the previous day’s hearing in the Assembly but also several other organizations such as the Rural County Representatives of California, Public Health Advocates, and the American Heart Association, among others.

Throughout the discussion on the budget trailer bill, members of the subcommittee asked thought-provoking questions and voiced points consistent with ACWA’s arguments.

Specifically, Wieckowski noted the problematic approach of requiring water districts to collect a tax on water with an exemption for those with income equal to or less than 200% of the federal poverty level when agencies have no mechanism to verify that information. Sen. Henry Stern (D-Canoga Park) expressed concerns regarding the nexus of the tax, asking if his constituents in Los Angeles could expect their safe drinking water needs to be addressed with the funding mechanism. At the conclusion of the hearing, Sen. Jim Nielsen (R-Gerber) reiterated earlier concerns related to using the budget trailer bill process rather than the policy committee process to vet such an important policy.

After hearing all testimony, the subcommittee opted to hold the item open to allow further consideration of the issues involved before making a decision. 

Next Steps

ACWA is extremely thankful for the engagement of the many ACWA member agencies and associates that testified in opposition to a tax on drinking water during these hearings.  Because the budget trailer bill was left open in both the Assembly and Senate, both budget subcommittees can choose to take up the bill at any time, without further public input.  ACWA will carefully monitor the activity of these subcommittees.

Additionally, ACWA members also should be aware that while SB 623 (Monning, 2017) could be moved from the Assembly Rules Committee at any time, action on SB 623 is not expected while the budget trailer bill is pending.

ACWA will keep members informed on critical developments as the budget trailer bill process advances, and if SB 623 is moved.

ACWA continues to lead a team of advocates that is lobbying the coalition’s oppose-unless-amended position at the Assembly and the Senate.

Questions

For questions regarding the budget trailer bill or ACWA’s advocacy on the bill, please contact ACWA Deputy Executive Director for Government Relations Cindy Tuck or ACWA Director of State Legislative Relations Wendy Ridderbusch. Both can be reached at (916) 441-4545.

Suggested Resources

15 RESOURCES prev next
Comment Letter: Proposed Decision Adopting Additional and Modified De-Energization Guidelines

Agency: California Public Utilities Commission Subject: Joint Comments of Valley Center Municipal Water District, Padre Dam Municipal Water District, Municipal Water […]

Comment Letter: White Paper Discussion on Economic Feasibility Analysis in Consideration of a Hexavalent Chromium MCL

To: Jeanine Townsend, Clerk to the Board State Water Resources Control Board Subject: White Paper Discussion on Economic Feasibility Analysis […]

ACWA Submits Letters Urging State and Federal Leadership to Achieve Voluntary Agreements

To: Governor Newsom and U.S. Department of Interior Secretary Bernhardt Subject: Voluntary Agreements Description: ACWA urges Gov. Newsom and Secretary […]

Coalition Letter: Funding for Water Infrastructure & Affordability in Response to COVID-19 Pandemic

To: Speaker Pelosi, Minority Leader McCarthy and Members of the California Congressional Delegation: Subject: Include Urgently Needed Funding for Water […]

Webinar: How to Reduce Costs with PG&E’s New Time-of-Use (TOU) Rate Analysis

Sorry, but only ACWA members have permission to view this content. Member login is required.

Comment Letter: Draft Handbook for Water Budget Development

Agency: California Department of Water Resources Subject: Comment Letter on the ‘Draft Handbook for Water Budget Development: With or Without […]

Federal Regulatory Issues Chart

Sorry, but only ACWA members have permission to view this content. Member login is required.

2019 Year in Review

Throughout 2019, ACWA advanced its policy goals by employing robust advocacy at the state and federal levels. Collaborative work with member […]

Comment Letter: REMAT Proposed Decision

Agency: California Public Utilities Commission Subject: Comments of REMAT Parties on Proposed Decision Adopting New Standard Offer Contract for Qualifying […]

Webinar: COVID-19 Series – Virtual Water Agency Board Meetings During COVID-19

Sorry, but only ACWA members have permission to view this content. Member login is required.

Comment Letter: Proposed Definition of “Microplastics in Drinking Water”

Agency: State Water Resources Control Board Subject: ACWA’s Comments regarding Proposed Definition of “Microplastics in Drinking Water” Letter excerpt: The […]

Comment Letter: ACWA Request for COVID-19 Federal Relief Funding

To: Leader McConnell, Speaker Pelosi, Leader Schumer, and Leader McCarthy Subject: ACWA Request for COVID-19 Federal Relief Funding Letter excerpt: The […]

Webinar: COVID-19 Series – Understanding the Financial Aspects

Sorry, but only ACWA members have permission to view this content. Member login is required.

Comment Letter: Request Tax Credit for State and Local Governments in HR 6201

To: Leader McConnell, Speaker Pelosi, Leader Schumer, and Leader McCarthy Subject: ACWA Request to Correct Tax Credit for State and Local […]

Webinar: COVID-19 Series – Operational Challenges

Sorry, but only ACWA members have permission to view this content. Member login is required.

Suggested News

15 Articles prev next
University of California Conducting Groundwater Resilience Survey

The University of California, Irvine’s Water Program (Water UCI) has organized a survey of the various California water and groundwater […]

West Basin Announces Summer Splash 2020 Virtual Water Education Series

West Basin Municipal Water District (West Basin) is offering a summer lineup of virtual education classes and other family-friendly resources […]

Mesa Water Director James R. Fisler Re-confirmed as Special District Regular Member of Orange County Local Agency Formation Commission

Mesa Water District (Mesa Water®) is pleased to announce that Director James R. (“Jim”) Fisler was re-appointed to Orange County […]

Bureau of Reclamation’s Burman to Address 2020 Summer Virtual Conference

U.S. Bureau of Reclamation Commissioner Brenda Burman is the latest top decision maker within the water industry confirmed as a […]

Now in Effect: State Wetland Definition and Procedures for Discharging

As of May 28, the State Wetland Definition and Procedures for the Discharges of Dredged or Fill Material to Waters […]

East County Advanced Water Purification Program moves forward with key service agreement approvals

SANTEE – The East County Advanced Water Purification (AWP) Joint Powers Authority (JPA) Board of Directors and all partnering agencies […]

Regional collaboration on water purification project expands local, drought-proof supply of drinking water

The Helix Water District Board of Directors authorized its General Manager to sign water purchase agreements for the East County […]

Facilities with long-term closures encouraged to flush water pipes prior to reopening

RIVERSIDE – Western Municipal Water District (Western) is encouraging businesses, schools and other buildings that have been closed to flush […]

UWPA Board Hires New General Manager

ANGELS CAMP – The Utica Water and Power Authority (UWPA) Board of Directors is pleased to announce that Joel Metzger […]

AVEK receives $89,954 Refund for Maintaining a Safe Workplace

PALMDALE – A low number of worker’s compensation claims and minimizing liabilities earned the Antelope Valley-East Kern Water Agency (AVEK) a […]

Lieutenant Governor, State Water Leaders to Address 2020 Summer Virtual Conference Attendees

California Lt. Gov. Eleni Kounalakis, California Natural Resources Secretary Wade Crowfoot and Department of Water Resources Director Karla Nemeth will […]

i-Meter Update – Scotts Valley Water District

SCOTTS VALLEY — Scotts Valley Water District crews have upgraded approximately 85 percent of all water meters to new intelligent […]

Spotlight: ACWA Members Respond to Unprecedented Challenges Presented by COVID-19 – May 2020

The COVID-19 pandemic has presented unprecedented challenges to California water agencies and continues to leave the state’s essential water and […]

State Water Project Allocation Increases to 20%

SACRAMENTO – The State Water Project (SWP) now expects to deliver 20% of requested supplies in 2020 thanks to above-average precipitation […]

ACWA News Available for May 22, 2020

Sorry, but only ACWA members have permission to view this content. Member login is required.