ACWA Advocates for Balanced Alternative to Drinking Water Tax During Emotional Budget Subcommittee Hearings at the Capitol

  • by Emily Allshouse
  • Mar 16, 2018
  • Water News

This week during budget subcommittee hearings in the Assembly and Senate, ACWA and several member agencies testified in opposition to the drinking water tax proposed in the Brown Administration’s budget trailer bill related to safe drinking water, and instead strongly advocated for ACWA’s alternative funding proposal which would meet the goal of the proposed legislation without a tax on drinking water.

Wednesday’s budget hearing included lengthy and emotional public testimony in support of the tax by dozens of men, women and children from disadvantaged communities that lack safe drinking water. ACWA’s testimony at both hearings emphasized the water community’s dedication to advancing solutions to this real and serious problem, while standing firmly in opposition to an impractical and unnecessary tax on drinking water.

Assembly Hearing – Wednesday, March 14

Cautioning attendees that the day’s agenda was “packed,” Assembly Budget Subcommittee No. 3 on Resources and Transportation Chair Richard Bloom (D-Santa Monica) began Wednesday’s hearing with an initial announcement that he would limit public testimony to name, organization and position.

After working through 11 other issues on its agenda, the budget trailer bill proposal was taken up last by the committee. ACWA Director of State Legislative Relations Wendy Ridderbusch provided the lead opposition testimony during public comment.

“We support a credible and equitable funding mix – an alternative – that includes ongoing federal safe drinking water state revolving fund dollars, reliable general obligation water bond money, focused nitrate assessments and the state’s general fund to create a funding source, for instance a protected and secured endowment fund, to pay for operation and maintenance costs,” said Ridderbusch. “We feel that we need this balanced funding portfolio package to ensure that there is safe and affordable drinking water in the communities that don’t have access to it.”

“Why can’t we work together? Why can’t we try something different?” she added.

Representatives from ACWA member agencies and associates also testified in opposition to a drinking water tax and in support of ACWA’s alternative funding proposal during public comment. Those agencies included: California Municipal Utilities Association, Irvine Ranch Water District, South Tahoe Public Utility District, Carmichael Water District, Hidden Valley Lake Community Services District, City of Santa Rosa, City of Burbank, Camrosa Water District, Yuba County Water Agency, East Valley Water District, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Fresno, United Conservation Water District, Zone 7 Water, Westlands Water District, Mojave Water District, Western Municipal Water District, Alameda County Water District, Eastern Municipal Water District, Mesa Water District, Santa Margarita Water District, Helix Water District, San Diego County Water Authority, Regional Water Authority, Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District, Las Virgenes Municipal Water District, Municipal Water District of Orange County, Monterey Peninsula Water Management District, City of Watsonville, and Otay Water District.

Opposition to the drinking water tax was also expressed by the League of California Cities, California Special Districts Association, and Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association, among several others.

Those testifying in support of the proposed tax on drinking water included: Community Water Center, Western Growers, Environmental Defense Fund, Water Foundation and approximately 50 residents from disadvantaged communities that lack safe drinking water.

“Support this bill, or drink our water,” they implored the subcommittee.

After hearing all testimony, the subcommittee opted to hold the item open to allow further consideration of the issues involved before making a decision. Additionally, to inform the subcommittee’s deliberations, Bloom asked State Water Resources Control Board Chair Felicia Marcus to respond to opposition concerns that were raised during the hearing in a letter addressed to the subcommittee.

Senate Hearing – Thursday, March 15

Just as it had been the day before in the Assembly, the budget trailer bill was the last item on the agenda for the Senate Budget Subcommittee No. 2 on Resources, Environmental Protection, Energy and Transportation hearing. Interestingly, in discussing earlier agenda items, subcommittee members debated the merits of using the state’s general fund versus special funds for issues of statewide importance. During that debate subcommittee Chair Bob Wieckowski (D-Fremont) appeared to be supportive of some uses of the general fund under this heading.

Ed Manning, who represents Mojave Water District, Westlands Water District, and Western Municipal Water District, kicked off public comments with a reminder to the subcommittee that the drinking water tax proposal before them has not received any review by a legislative policy committee. He also expressed his concerns with using the budget trailer bill process to vet high-priority, substantive policy issues rather than a transparent legislative policy committee process.

Ridderbusch then testified on behalf of ACWA continuing to deliver key messages regarding opposition to a drinking water tax and specifically highlighting recent ACWA-sponsored polling that shows that 74% of Californians believe the state should using existing funds for safe drinking water. Additionally, the polling shows that Californians believe it is not appropriate to tax a resource that is essential to life. She also expressed concerns over the precedent of the tax.

“It’s not just going to be a dollar a month, like we’ve heard…” Ridderbusch said regarding the tax, noting that there are other parties vying for funds from a tax on water for many other purposes.

Following Ridderbusch’s testimony many of the same ACWA member agencies and associates testified in alignment with ACWA’s position. Orange County Water District, Rincon Del Diablo Municipal Water District, Olivenhain Municipal Water District, Padre Dam Municipal Water District, and Long Beach Water also weighed in to oppose a tax on drinking water.

Additionally, several other groups expressed opposition to the agricultural enforcement relief provisions included in the bill, citing inconsistency with the “polluter pays” principle, which was noted by the subcommittee.

Those testifying in support included many of the same organizations from the previous day’s hearing in the Assembly but also several other organizations such as the Rural County Representatives of California, Public Health Advocates, and the American Heart Association, among others.

Throughout the discussion on the budget trailer bill, members of the subcommittee asked thought-provoking questions and voiced points consistent with ACWA’s arguments.

Specifically, Wieckowski noted the problematic approach of requiring water districts to collect a tax on water with an exemption for those with income equal to or less than 200% of the federal poverty level when agencies have no mechanism to verify that information. Sen. Henry Stern (D-Canoga Park) expressed concerns regarding the nexus of the tax, asking if his constituents in Los Angeles could expect their safe drinking water needs to be addressed with the funding mechanism. At the conclusion of the hearing, Sen. Jim Nielsen (R-Gerber) reiterated earlier concerns related to using the budget trailer bill process rather than the policy committee process to vet such an important policy.

After hearing all testimony, the subcommittee opted to hold the item open to allow further consideration of the issues involved before making a decision. 

Next Steps

ACWA is extremely thankful for the engagement of the many ACWA member agencies and associates that testified in opposition to a tax on drinking water during these hearings.  Because the budget trailer bill was left open in both the Assembly and Senate, both budget subcommittees can choose to take up the bill at any time, without further public input.  ACWA will carefully monitor the activity of these subcommittees.

Additionally, ACWA members also should be aware that while SB 623 (Monning, 2017) could be moved from the Assembly Rules Committee at any time, action on SB 623 is not expected while the budget trailer bill is pending.

ACWA will keep members informed on critical developments as the budget trailer bill process advances, and if SB 623 is moved.

ACWA continues to lead a team of advocates that is lobbying the coalition’s oppose-unless-amended position at the Assembly and the Senate.

Questions

For questions regarding the budget trailer bill or ACWA’s advocacy on the bill, please contact ACWA Deputy Executive Director for Government Relations Cindy Tuck or ACWA Director of State Legislative Relations Wendy Ridderbusch. Both can be reached at (916) 441-4545.

Suggested Resources

15 RESOURCES prev next
ACWA Comment Letter on Notification Levels for PFOA and PFOS

Agency: State Water Resources Control Board, Division of Drinking Water Subject: Notification Levels and Response Levels for perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) […]

July 2019 Federal Regulatory Issues Chart

Sorry, but only ACWA members have permission to view this content. Member login is required.

ACWA and CMUA Comment Letter on the Drinking Water Needs Assessment Conceptual Plan

Sorry, but only ACWA members have permission to view this content. Member login is required.

ACWA Dues Automation Process Webinar

ACWA has a recording available of the webinar on the new Dues Automation Process. The purpose of this recording is to assist […]

ACWA 2019 Spring Conference Presentations

Presentations from ACWA’s 2019 Spring Conference & Exhibition held May 7-10 in Monterey are available below. Please note that this […]

Priority Issues Bulletin

Sorry, but only ACWA members have permission to view this content. Member login is required.

Comment Letter on the Proposed Framework for Performance Standards for Water Loss

Agency: State Water Resources Control Board Subject: Proposed Framework for Performance Standards for Water Loss Letter excerpt:  Dear Mr. Gomberg: Thank […]

Federal Legislative Matrix

Sorry, but only ACWA members have permission to view this content. Member login is required.

Overview Presentations: Water Conservation/Water Use Efficiency Laws of 2018 (AB 1668/SB 606) and Implementation Challenges

State Overview by Peter Brostrom, Department of Water Resources (May 2019) Implementations Challenges by David Bolland, ACWA (May 2019) A […]

May 2019 Federal Regulatory Issues Chart

Sorry, but only ACWA members have permission to view this content. Member login is required.

COMMENT LETTER: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Proposed Revised Definition of “Waters of the United States”

Agency: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Subject: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the U.S. […]

California H2O: Flowing for the Future

ACWA and J Comm, Inc. have collaborated to create a 10-part video series to educate Californians about critical water issues. […]

Energy and Water Resources Policy Principles

In January 2019, ACWA released policy principles on “Energy and Water Resources” in California. The updated principles will help guide […]

ACWA’s 2019 Spring Legal Briefing and CLE Workshop Materials

The following presentations and materials for ACWA’s 2019 Legal Briefing and CLE Workshop on May. 7 from 9 a.m. to […]

ACWA Suggested Guidelines for 2019 Triennial Reporting of Public Health Goal Exceedance in Drinking Water

Agency: Public Water Systems and State Water Resources Control Board Division of Drinking Water Subject: Suggested Guidelines for Preparation of Required […]

Suggested News

15 Articles prev next
District recognized as Chamber ‘Member of the Year’ for Sewer System Funding Efforts

YUCCA VALLEY – Hi-Desert Water District (HDWD) was named Member of the Year by the Yucca Valley Chamber of Commerce […]

SCV Water Moves Forward with Testing Water Treatment to Remove PFAS

The SCV Water Board of Directors approved expedited testing of treatment options for per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), which were […]

SWEETWATER AUTHORITY AWARDS GRANTS TO SUPPORT WATER EFFICIENCY IN SOUTH BAY

CHULA VISTA – The Sweetwater Authority (Authority) Board of Directors presented checks to the City of Chula Vista and the […]

July 2019 Priority Issues Update

Sorry, but only ACWA members have permission to view this content. Member login is required.

General Manager Steve Nugent of Carmichael Water District Retires

With over 37 years in the water industry, Carmichael Water District (CWD) General Manager, Steve Nugent, announced his retirement on […]

ACWA Accepting Applications and Nominations for Fall Awards

ACWA will present several awards at its 2019 Fall Conference & Exhibition in San Diego, being held Dec. 3-6, and […]

ACWA Supports Legislature’s Approval of Safe Drinking Water Funding Solution

SACRAMENTO – The Senate July 8 approved SB 200 (Monning), putting California one step closer to enacting the second part […]

South Coast Water District Certifies EIR for Ocean Desalination Project

On June 27, the South Coast Water District (SCWD) Board of Directors certified the Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for […]

Annual Water Quality Report: Western’s Water is Clean and Safe to Drink

RIVERSIDE – The annual report card on Western Municipal Water District’s water quality is in and the results reflect, as […]

Walnut Valley Water District Details Strategic Vision for the Future

WALNUT – The Walnut Valley Water District (WVWD) Board of Directors has formally adopted a strategic plan for 2019, which […]

New Website Offers RWD Customers Improved User Experience

ROWLAND HEIGHTS – Rowland Water District launched a brand new website featuring enhanced content, more intuitive navigation and a suite […]

AAA-Rated Moulton Niguel Approves On-Time, Balanced Budget

Moulton Niguel Water District, which holds a coveted AAA credit rating from two independent credit ratings agencies, has approved an […]

ACWA Comments on California Fiscal Year 2019-’20 Budget

SACRAMENTO – ACWA Executive Director Dave Eggerton issued the following statement in response to Gov. Gavin Newsom’s signing of the […]

Governor Approves 2019-’20 California State Budget

California Gov. Gavin Newsom has signed the 2019-’20 state budget that addresses a number of key ACWA priority goals, ranging […]

Mojave Water Agency Board Member Earns DPA.

Kimberly Cox, a water professional and longtime Mojave Water Agency Board Member, recently received her Doctorate in Public Administration from […]